<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White-mantled Wainscot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/07/18/white-mantled-wainscot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/07/18/white-mantled-wainscot/</link>
	<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/07/18/white-mantled-wainscot/#comment-2555</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=7151#comment-2555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is also doing well here in Norfolk Raymond. I recorded 6 here on 13th of this month at the regular site and found a new site for it on the 9th.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also doing well here in Norfolk Raymond. I recorded 6 here on 13th of this month at the regular site and found a new site for it on the 9th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Watson</title>
		<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/07/18/white-mantled-wainscot/#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=7151#comment-2554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen all the comments now Neil. Looks to be good for neurica. So Suffolk no longer the only centre for the species. I&#039;ve had a couple recently so they seem to be doing well in Suffolk this year. Though that can be said for many species this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen all the comments now Neil. Looks to be good for neurica. So Suffolk no longer the only centre for the species. I&#8217;ve had a couple recently so they seem to be doing well in Suffolk this year. Though that can be said for many species this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/07/18/white-mantled-wainscot/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=7151#comment-2553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen this photo Raymond and could possibly be neurica especially as the recorder notes that there are no spots on the underside of the wings. I have replied about the fact neurica has a skinny abdomen too as another feature to check but the photos don&#039;t show this. Moth has been retained so hopefully will get to the bottom of the id.
Not heard of it being a migrant species, although it must make some local movements as it has been spreading in Suffolk. It could occur in Somerset as there is a lot of reedbed down there around the levels area. Will be an interesting record if confirmed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this photo Raymond and could possibly be neurica especially as the recorder notes that there are no spots on the underside of the wings. I have replied about the fact neurica has a skinny abdomen too as another feature to check but the photos don&#8217;t show this. Moth has been retained so hopefully will get to the bottom of the id.<br />
Not heard of it being a migrant species, although it must make some local movements as it has been spreading in Suffolk. It could occur in Somerset as there is a lot of reedbed down there around the levels area. Will be an interesting record if confirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
