Comments on: Newly named species of Anarsia http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/ Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 By: Neil http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/#comment-2498 Neil Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:22:20 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6783#comment-2498 All of my sightings of this moth are certainly innoxiella as they are identical to your photos Paul. I expect all recent Suffolk reports to be the species also. We saw it in the brecks last year so there is at least one record for that vice county too. Plenty of Field maple around me.

]]>
By: Raymond Watson http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/#comment-2497 Raymond Watson Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:09:39 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6783#comment-2497 Thanks for posting this Paul. The issue I think surfaced initially in UK moth circles on the dissection site. It made a great deal of sense to me when I first saw it. I had been bemused as to how a peach twig borer was turning up widely across Britain. We now know that actually it is an Acer feeder. Makes a lot more sense! I am of the opinion that most if not all the records of the Peach Twig Borer will turn our to be A. innoxiella and feel that we may well have missed it in years gone by.

]]>
By: Paul Kitchener http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/#comment-2496 Paul Kitchener Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:52:18 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6783#comment-2496 Sorry for the poor excuse for a link. I did try and rectify it.
Paul

]]>
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on: Newly named species of Anarsia</title>
<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/</link>
<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
<item>
<title>By: Neil</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/#comment-2498</link>
<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6783#comment-2498</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ All of my sightings of this moth are certainly innoxiella as they are identical to your photos Paul. I expect all recent Suffolk reports to be the species also. We saw it in the brecks last year so there is at least one record for that vice county too. Plenty of Field maple around me. ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>All of my sightings of this moth are certainly innoxiella as they are identical to your photos Paul. I expect all recent Suffolk reports to be the species also. We saw it in the brecks last year so there is at least one record for that vice county too. Plenty of Field maple around me.</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>By: Raymond Watson</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/#comment-2497</link>
<dc:creator>Raymond Watson</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6783#comment-2497</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Thanks for posting this Paul. The issue I think surfaced initially in UK moth circles on the dissection site. It made a great deal of sense to me when I first saw it. I had been bemused as to how a peach twig borer was turning up widely across Britain. We now know that actually it is an Acer feeder. Makes a lot more sense! I am of the opinion that most if not all the records of the Peach Twig Borer will turn our to be A. innoxiella and feel that we may well have missed it in years gone by. ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Thanks for posting this Paul. The issue I think surfaced initially in UK moth circles on the dissection site. It made a great deal of sense to me when I first saw it. I had been bemused as to how a peach twig borer was turning up widely across Britain. We now know that actually it is an Acer feeder. Makes a lot more sense! I am of the opinion that most if not all the records of the Peach Twig Borer will turn our to be A. innoxiella and feel that we may well have missed it in years gone by.</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>By: Paul Kitchener</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/03/25/newly-named-species-of-anarsia/#comment-2496</link>
<dc:creator>Paul Kitchener</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6783#comment-2496</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Sorry for the poor excuse for a link. I did try and rectify it. Paul ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Sorry for the poor excuse for a link. I did try and rectify it.<br /> Paul</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>