<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2016 a poor year for moths?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/01/03/2016-a-poor-year-for-moths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/01/03/2016-a-poor-year-for-moths/</link>
	<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/01/03/2016-a-poor-year-for-moths/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6668#comment-2471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My recollection was species counts were ok. However, there were often cases of single or low counts per species so overall moth numbers, not species counts, were down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My recollection was species counts were ok. However, there were often cases of single or low counts per species so overall moth numbers, not species counts, were down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
