<title>Comments on: 2016 a poor year for moths?</title>
<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/01/03/2016-a-poor-year-for-moths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/01/03/2016-a-poor-year-for-moths/</link>
<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
<item>
<title>By: keith</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2017/01/03/2016-a-poor-year-for-moths/#comment-2471</link>
<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6668#comment-2471</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ My recollection was species counts were ok. However, there were often cases of single or low counts per species so overall moth numbers, not species counts, were down. ]]>
...</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>My recollection was species counts were ok. However, there were often cases of single or low counts per species so overall moth numbers, not species counts, were down.</p>
]]>
...</content:encoded>
...</item>