Comments on: 2 for ID http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/ Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 By: Paul Kitchener http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2397 Paul Kitchener Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:55:23 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2397 I would say E. osseana too, markings and wing shape are good for that. I do have a dorsal shot of mine and I’ll try to post – don’t know if I can attach an image to a “reply”.

Paul

]]>
By: Stuart Ling http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2396 Stuart Ling Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:50:31 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2396 Thanks for the feedback so far. I was fairly happy with the Pexicopia, but I’m no expert with Gelichids so it’ s always good to get confirmation from others with more knowledge.
Regarding the other, I was leaning towards Eana osseana myself but due to it’s relative scarcity in Suffolk I felt confirmation was needed. I am aware of Paul’s record and photos which aided my initial I’d. Sorry Raymond but I don’t see it as a Bactra and it doesn’t look right for Cnephasia longana either. I would welcome further opinion.

Stuart

]]>
By: Neil http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2395 Neil Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:00:20 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2395 I agree with Pexicopia malvella, no problems there. The other one looks very much like Eana osseana, a moth that Paul Kitchener has also recorded in Ipswich but one I’ve not seen at IGC. Check that moth in the books and on the web sites Stuart and see if it matches.

]]>
By: Raymond Watson http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2394 Raymond Watson Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:42 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2394 Pexicopia malvella looks OK the other looks like a Bactra species. Someone such as Neil may do better on that.

]]>
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on: 2 for ID</title>
<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/</link>
<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
<item>
<title>By: Paul Kitchener</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2397</link>
<dc:creator>Paul Kitchener</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2397</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ I would say E. osseana too, markings and wing shape are good for that. I do have a dorsal shot of mine and I&#039;ll try to post - don&#039;t know if I can attach an image to a &quot;reply&quot;. Paul ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>I would say E. osseana too, markings and wing shape are good for that. I do have a dorsal shot of mine and I&#8217;ll try to post &#8211; don&#8217;t know if I can attach an image to a &#8220;reply&#8221;.</p> <p>Paul</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>By: Stuart Ling</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2396</link>
<dc:creator>Stuart Ling</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2396</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Thanks for the feedback so far. I was fairly happy with the Pexicopia, but I&#039;m no expert with Gelichids so it&#039; s always good to get confirmation from others with more knowledge. Regarding the other, I was leaning towards Eana osseana myself but due to it&#039;s relative scarcity in Suffolk I felt confirmation was needed. I am aware of Paul&#039;s record and photos which aided my initial I&#039;d. Sorry Raymond but I don&#039;t see it as a Bactra and it doesn&#039;t look right for Cnephasia longana either. I would welcome further opinion. Stuart ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Thanks for the feedback so far. I was fairly happy with the Pexicopia, but I&#8217;m no expert with Gelichids so it&#8217; s always good to get confirmation from others with more knowledge.<br /> Regarding the other, I was leaning towards Eana osseana myself but due to it&#8217;s relative scarcity in Suffolk I felt confirmation was needed. I am aware of Paul&#8217;s record and photos which aided my initial I&#8217;d. Sorry Raymond but I don&#8217;t see it as a Bactra and it doesn&#8217;t look right for Cnephasia longana either. I would welcome further opinion. </p> <p>Stuart</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>By: Neil</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2395</link>
<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2395</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ I agree with Pexicopia malvella, no problems there. The other one looks very much like Eana osseana, a moth that Paul Kitchener has also recorded in Ipswich but one I&#039;ve not seen at IGC. Check that moth in the books and on the web sites Stuart and see if it matches. ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>I agree with Pexicopia malvella, no problems there. The other one looks very much like Eana osseana, a moth that Paul Kitchener has also recorded in Ipswich but one I&#8217;ve not seen at IGC. Check that moth in the books and on the web sites Stuart and see if it matches.</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>By: Raymond Watson</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2394</link>
<dc:creator>Raymond Watson</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2394</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Pexicopia malvella looks OK the other looks like a Bactra species. Someone such as Neil may do better on that. ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Pexicopia malvella looks OK the other looks like a Bactra species. Someone such as Neil may do better on that.</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>