<title>Comments on: 2 for ID</title>
<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/</link>
<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
<item>
<title>By: Paul Kitchener</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2397</link>
<dc:creator>Paul Kitchener</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2397</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ I would say E. osseana too, markings and wing shape are good for that. I do have a dorsal shot of mine and I'll try to post - don't know if I can attach an image to a "reply".
Paul ]]>
...</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>I would say E. osseana too, markings and wing shape are good for that. I do have a dorsal shot of mine and I’ll try to post – don’t know if I can attach an image to a “reply”.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]>
...</content:encoded>
...</item>
<item>
<title>By: Stuart Ling</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2396</link>
<dc:creator>Stuart Ling</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2396</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Thanks for the feedback so far. I was fairly happy with the Pexicopia, but I'm no expert with Gelichids so it' s always good to get confirmation from others with more knowledge.
Regarding the other, I was leaning towards Eana osseana myself but due to it's relative scarcity in Suffolk I felt confirmation was needed. I am aware of Paul's record and photos which aided my initial I'd. Sorry Raymond but I don't see it as a Bactra and it doesn't look right for Cnephasia longana either. I would welcome further opinion.
Stuart ]]>
...</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Thanks for the feedback so far. I was fairly happy with the Pexicopia, but I’m no expert with Gelichids so it’ s always good to get confirmation from others with more knowledge.<br />
Regarding the other, I was leaning towards Eana osseana myself but due to it’s relative scarcity in Suffolk I felt confirmation was needed. I am aware of Paul’s record and photos which aided my initial I’d. Sorry Raymond but I don’t see it as a Bactra and it doesn’t look right for Cnephasia longana either. I would welcome further opinion. </p>
<p>Stuart</p>
]]>
...</content:encoded>
...</item>
<item>
<title>By: Neil</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2395</link>
<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2395</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ I agree with Pexicopia malvella, no problems there. The other one looks very much like Eana osseana, a moth that Paul Kitchener has also recorded in Ipswich but one I've not seen at IGC. Check that moth in the books and on the web sites Stuart and see if it matches. ]]>
...</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>I agree with Pexicopia malvella, no problems there. The other one looks very much like Eana osseana, a moth that Paul Kitchener has also recorded in Ipswich but one I’ve not seen at IGC. Check that moth in the books and on the web sites Stuart and see if it matches.</p>
]]>
...</content:encoded>
...</item>
<item>
<title>By: Raymond Watson</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2016/06/25/2-for-id/#comment-2394</link>
<dc:creator>Raymond Watson</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=6231#comment-2394</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Pexicopia malvella looks OK the other looks like a Bactra species. Someone such as Neil may do better on that. ]]>
...</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Pexicopia malvella looks OK the other looks like a Bactra species. Someone such as Neil may do better on that.</p>
]]>
...</content:encoded>
...</item>