<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bactra lacteana in Suffolk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/</link>
	<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kitchener</title>
		<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kitchener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=5907#comment-2318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Raymond. There were no other Bactra in the same catch for a direct comparison but I did get the impression of it being slightly smaller than the frequent &quot;lancealana&quot;. I believe there&#039;s some degree of overlap though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Raymond. There were no other Bactra in the same catch for a direct comparison but I did get the impression of it being slightly smaller than the frequent &#8220;lancealana&#8221;. I believe there&#8217;s some degree of overlap though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Watson</title>
		<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=5907#comment-2317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good Paul. Literature suggests it is smaller than our usual Bactra species. Was that noticeable?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good Paul. Literature suggests it is smaller than our usual Bactra species. Was that noticeable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
