Comments on: Bactra lacteana in Suffolk http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/ Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 By: Paul Kitchener http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/#comment-2318 Paul Kitchener Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:37:57 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=5907#comment-2318 Thanks Raymond. There were no other Bactra in the same catch for a direct comparison but I did get the impression of it being slightly smaller than the frequent “lancealana”. I believe there’s some degree of overlap though.

]]>
By: Raymond Watson http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/#comment-2317 Raymond Watson Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:33:42 +0000 http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=5907#comment-2317 Very good Paul. Literature suggests it is smaller than our usual Bactra species. Was that noticeable?

]]>
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Comments on: Bactra lacteana in Suffolk</title>
<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/</link>
<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
<item>
<title>By: Paul Kitchener</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/#comment-2318</link>
<dc:creator>Paul Kitchener</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=5907#comment-2318</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Thanks Raymond. There were no other Bactra in the same catch for a direct comparison but I did get the impression of it being slightly smaller than the frequent &quot;lancealana&quot;. I believe there&#039;s some degree of overlap though. ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Thanks Raymond. There were no other Bactra in the same catch for a direct comparison but I did get the impression of it being slightly smaller than the frequent &#8220;lancealana&#8221;. I believe there&#8217;s some degree of overlap though.</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>By: Raymond Watson</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2015/11/12/5907/#comment-2317</link>
<dc:creator>Raymond Watson</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=5907#comment-2317</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ Very good Paul. Literature suggests it is smaller than our usual Bactra species. Was that noticeable? ]]>
</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>Very good Paul. Literature suggests it is smaller than our usual Bactra species. Was that noticeable?</p> ]]>
</content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>