<title>Comments on: Common quaker name change to Abundant quaker?</title>
<atom:link href="http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2014/03/18/common-quaker-name-change-to-abundant-quaker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2014/03/18/common-quaker-name-change-to-abundant-quaker/</link>
<description>Topical information from the Suffolk Moth Group</description>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
<item>
<title>By: Raymond Watson</title>
<link>http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/index.php/2014/03/18/common-quaker-name-change-to-abundant-quaker/#comment-2061</link>
<dc:creator>Raymond Watson</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 07:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suffolkmoths.org.uk/blog/?p=4232#comment-2061</guid>
<description>
<![CDATA[ It does seem to be the year of the Common Quaker. Only had 94 to your 156 but it has been the most abundant species since it first appeared this year. Hebrew Character seems to be low. ]]>
...</description>
<content:encoded>
<![CDATA[ <p>It does seem to be the year of the Common Quaker. Only had 94 to your 156 but it has been the most abundant species since it first appeared this year. Hebrew Character seems to be low.</p>
]]>
...</content:encoded>
...</item>